Comments on: Dakota Fanning Set For Twilight Sequel New Moon?

By: Laura

Laura — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:32:41 +0000

hmm i thought she wud be good for the part but obviously i dont remember she had brown hair.. which changes a lot for me.. i never wanted to read the books bcoz apparently for most people reading it 1st ruined the movie.. but i gave in coz they were too good so im worried ill be disappointed in the movie.. DONT CHANGE THE STORY OR THE CHARACTERS , (unless one passes away or leaves or cant act anymore for any reason, then there is not much you can do about that so who cares .. )

By: Bella Cullen

Bella Cullen — Tue, 09 Jun 2009 00:29:04 +0000

I dont want to judge yet because I haven't seen her act in New Moon ,nobody has.

By: ALLY

ALLY — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:49:42 +0000

I THINK SHE IS PERFECT FOR THE PART AND WHEN I HEARD ABOUT HER BEING IN THE MOVIE I WAS SOOOOO EXCITED!!! SHE IS BEAUTIFUL AND SHOULD PLAY THE ART!!
LOVE
ALLYSON

By: i love jacob!!

i love jacob!! — Thu, 30 Apr 2009 02:01:39 +0000

you look nothing like the description of jane in the book!

and i thought alll the vampires were soupppose to look beautiful! your not beautiful!

srry but your NOT good for the part!!

By: person

person — Wed, 11 Mar 2009 22:49:45 +0000

ew please no, dakota fanning should NOT be in new moon.
this is discusting, what are they thinking?!?!
ughh, she’s too young and her acting is soooo annoying.. i can’t stand to watch her in movies.

By: Stephanie T

Stephanie T — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:53:41 +0000

I am with all of you on this, she is lookin better than she used to as a little girl but the director should just go out and find a jane that is like the book describes. Dakota would not work for this part at all, and as she has recently admitted she only wants the part because she wants to be with Robert Pattison he is way too old for her.

By: jacob-lover!!!!

jacob-lover!!!! — Tue, 03 Feb 2009 01:34:04 +0000

I’m a big fan Dakota but I think that you being in the movie would ruin it. 1st of all, you don’t look like anything they describe in the book, and 2nd of all, I don’t see how you would fit as a vampire.

By: tea

tea — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:48:14 +0000

EWWWWWWW . they wish she jane was described “as a petite blonde ” the derector should read the book and make jane look like she is described. here is an extrat from the book.
At first i thought it was a young boy. The newcomer was as tiny as Alice,
with lank , pale brown hair trimmed short. The body under the cloak which
was darker, almost black , was slim and androgynous. But the face was too pretty
for a boy. The wide-eyed , full-lipped face would make a Botticelli angel look like a
gargoyle. Even alowing for the dull crimson irises. Her size was so insignificant that the
reaction to her appearance confused me. “Follow me,” Jane spoke again, her childish voice
a monotone.

im sorry but go get lost dakota

By: jordi

jordi — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:41:53 +0000

OMG . SHE IS DESCRIBED PALE BROWN HAIR, WITH LANK. SHE LOOKS LIKE SHE IS FRIKKEN 21 DAKOTA SHOULD GO AWAY FROM NEW MOON. GO AWAY!!!!!!!!!

By: coffee

coffee — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 04:18:11 +0000

They should be careful casting Dakota Fanning for New Moon, she might steal the show