In the ever-evolving landscape of musical biopics, filmmakers often grapple with how to stand out. “Better Man,” directed by Michael Gracey, the mastermind behind “The Greatest Showman,” takes audacity to another level. Paramount Pictures greenlit this $110 million gamble, casting Robbie Williams—not as himself or even a human actor—but as a fully CGI monkey. The premise is as bananas as it sounds, and the result is a kaleidoscope of ambition, visual ingenuity, and baffling narrative choices.
A Visual Experiment with Heart
At its core, “Better Man” isn’t just a story about Williams’ meteoric rise and fall; it’s a meta-commentary on identity and fame. Williams, portrayed by Jonno Davies through motion capture, is imbued with Weta FX’s state-of-the-art animation, bringing the primate persona to life with unnerving realism. From his early days as a boy band heartthrob in Take That to his solo stardom, the film leverages this surreal depiction to highlight the animalistic pressures of stardom.
Visually, the film is a triumph. The choreography, reminiscent of Bob Fosse’s theatrical flair, transforms Williams’ hit songs into dazzling set pieces. Gracey’s penchant for spectacle shines, especially in sequences like “Angels,” where the monkey-Williams croons amidst a cosmic storm of light and sound. However, the audacious choice of a monkey protagonist creates a strange dissonance, often overshadowing the emotional core of the story.
A Tale of Two Halves
Clocking in at 134 minutes, “Better Man” oscillates between brilliance and tedium. The first half brims with energy, introducing a young Williams grappling with self-doubt and the pressures of fame. But as the film delves deeper into his struggles with addiction and mental health, the narrative falters, weighed down by conventional biopic tropes. The CGI monkey, initially a bold artistic statement, becomes a distracting gimmick.
The supporting cast is human, a juxtaposition that raises intriguing questions about perspective but fails to fully explore them. Jonno Davies deserves credit for his layered performance, channeling Williams’ charm, vulnerability, and larger-than-life persona. Yet, the decision to render him as a monkey often undermines the gravitas of his journey.
Box Office Blues and Critical Fallout
Released on Christmas Day, the film has grossed a mere $100,000—a dismal start for a production of this scale. With a wider release slated for January 17, hopes are pinned on the film finding its audience. Yet, tepid reviews and dwindling awards buzz suggest an uphill battle.
Despite its flaws, “Better Man” deserves praise for its ambition. In an era of safe storytelling, it dares to be different, even if its execution leaves much to be desired.
“Better Man” is a paradox: visually inventive yet narratively clumsy, deeply ambitious but emotionally hollow. While it may not join the pantheon of great musical biopics, it stands as a testament to the risks filmmakers are willing to take in redefining the genre. Whether audiences embrace it or not, “Better Man” offers a peculiar, unforgettable cinematic experience.
Personal Impressions
“Better Man” left me conflicted. Its visual artistry is undeniable, and I applaud its willingness to experiment. Yet, the choice to portray Robbie Williams as a CGI monkey felt like a clever idea stretched too thin. It’s a film that wants to be bold but stumbles under the weight of its own eccentricity. Still, for all its flaws, it sparks conversation—a rare feat in today’s cinematic landscape.
What do you think of “Better Man’s” bold decision to use a CGI monkey? Can ambitious risks like this redefine the biopic genre, or do they alienate audiences? Share your thoughts below!
