In Small Things Like These, Cillian Murphy brings a story of resilience and moral conflict to life. Centered around Ireland's controversial Catholic-run asylums for women, the movie follows Murphy's character, Bill, as he makes a difficult choice to help a vulnerable woman, Sarah, challenging the powerful institution of the church. Despite the film's abrupt end, Murphy believes it adds depth and sparks meaningful conversation.
Small Things Like These, based on Claire Keegan's novel, paints a haunting picture of 1800s Ireland when the Catholic Church wielded immense power. Bill's journey unfolds as he confronts harsh realities, questioning his moral obligations. The movie builds tension as Bill decides to rescue Sarah from the oppressive asylum, highlighting a lesser-seen aspect of Ireland's past. But just as Bill makes his daring choice, the story stops short, leaving viewers in suspense.
Murphy sees the open ending as a strength, stating in a Radio Times interview that it allows audiences to interpret what follows. “The real crisis happens after the black,” he notes, suggesting that this ambiguity invites reflection on the church's role in society and the lingering impact of Bill's decision.
While some may find the ending abrupt, others appreciate its invitation to consider multiple outcomes. The unresolved finale symbolizes the start of a shift in the church's stronghold over people's lives. The movie's structure captures the story's essence, pushing viewers to grapple with moral complexities, just as Bill does.
With Small Things Like These, Murphy and director Tim Mielants bring a historical narrative into modern relevance, highlighting the complexities of personal integrity against institutional power. The ending, while divisive, mirrors the enduring question: can one act of bravery make a lasting impact? This unresolved conclusion reinforces the film's powerful message, resonating long after the credits roll.
Cillian Murphy's portrayal of Bill brings authenticity to Small Things Like These. His character embodies the internal struggle of a person torn between personal risk and moral duty. While the open-ended conclusion may frustrate some viewers, it effectively serves the story's theme, highlighting how history is rarely wrapped up neatly. The abruptness makes us ponder the future for characters like Sarah and Bill, and by extension, the countless others affected by these institutions. It's a bold choice that may feel unsettling, but it's ultimately thought-provoking, encouraging audiences to think deeply about the courage it takes to stand up against powerful structures.
Do you believe a single act of courage can change the course of an oppressive system? What might have happened to Bill and Sarah after the story ends?
