Josh Brolin Reflects on Thanos, Teases Return, and Talks Denis Villeneuve’s Bond

Ten years in a motion-capture onesie with dots all over your face, and Josh Brolin sounds like a man who genuinely loved every minute of it.

That’s the surprising takeaway from his recent interview with The Independent, where the actor reflected on playing Thanos across four Marvel films—from his brief 2014 Guardians of the Galaxy introduction to his universe-shattering arc through Infinity War and Endgame. But Brolin didn’t just look backward. He’s looking forward too: to Denis Villeneuve‘s James Bond reboot, to a likely Thanos variant return, and to navigating the strange intersection of Hollywood and American politics.

Josh Brolin on Playing Thanos and the Magic of Motion Capture

There’s something almost countercultural about Brolin’s enthusiasm for the technical grind of performance capture work. Most actors describe the process as alienating—all that green screen, all that imagination required to fill the void. Brolin describes it as liberating.

“You’re in a f***ing onesie, and you have dots all over your face, and it’s a joke, and you’re having to totally rely on your imagination,” he recalled. “It’s so great.”

I’ll confess something: that level of joy about a decade of motion-capture work shifts how I think about his Thanos performance. The Mad Titan’s gravitas, that patient certainty in his apocalyptic mission—it came from an actor who was genuinely having fun beneath all the CGI layers. That’s rarer than it should be.

The “perfect trajectory of 10 years” Brolin mentions suggests he sees his MCU arc as complete, but completion doesn’t mean finished. He’s expected to reprise Thanos as a variant in Avengers: Doomsday and/or Secret Wars. The prevailing fan theory points to a recreation of the iconic Secret Wars comic moment where Doctor Doom brutally kills Thanos—which would give Robert Downey Jr.’s Doom one hell of an introduction.

Denis Villeneuve’s James Bond Gets Brolin’s Enthusiastic Endorsement

The conversation pivoted from Marvel to another franchise universe entirely: James Bond. Denis Villeneuve is reportedly developing a 007 reboot for Amazon MGM, and Brolin—who worked with the director on both Dune films—couldn’t contain his enthusiasm.

“I think it’s going to be f***ing fantastic,” he said. “I would do anything with Denis. Talk about a guy who hasn’t drunk the Kool-Aid.”

That last phrase sits with me. “Hasn’t drunk the Kool-Aid” is pointed language from someone who’s worked in both massive franchise filmmaking and auteur-driven cinema. It suggests Brolin sees Villeneuve as maintaining artistic integrity despite operating at blockbuster scale—a distinction that matters when discussing Bond’s future.

Villeneuve bringing his Sicario/Blade Runner 2049/Dune sensibility to 007 could produce something genuinely different. Or it could be a fascinating collision of styles. Either way, having Brolin’s endorsement from inside the creative relationship carries weight.

The Knives Out Character That Isn’t About Who You Think

Brolin’s upcoming role in Rian Johnson’s Wake Up Dead Man: A Knives Out Mystery prompted questions about whether his character, Monsignor Wicks, was inspired by Donald Trump. His answer was more interesting than a simple denial.

“I could make something up and say it was rooted in a kind of Trumpian greed,” he started, before explaining that wasn’t the case. “Wicks garners a sense of power, then there are no boundaries.”

The distinction matters. Brolin isn’t playing a Trump parody; he’s playing a character study in what happens when power becomes untethered from accountability. That’s a more universal theme—and probably more disturbing because of it.

Here’s where the interview takes an unexpected turn. Brolin and Trump were apparently friends before the presidency, having connected while Brolin was shooting Oliver Stone’s Wall Street 2: Money Never Sleeps. That context colors everything that follows.

“I’m not scared of Trump, because even though he says he’s staying forever, it’s just not going to happen,” Brolin said. “And if it does, then I’ll deal with that moment.”

Brolin’s Surprisingly Nuanced Take on Political Marketing

The actor’s political observations were sharper than the typical Hollywood interview fodder. Discussing Trump’s rise during late-1970s New York real estate development—the $400 million hotel Brolin acknowledges probably involved “a lot of corruption”—he pivoted to something more analytical.

“There is no greater genius than him in marketing – he takes the weakness of the general population and fills it,” Brolin noted. “And that’s why I think a lot of people feel that they have a mascot in him. I think it’s much less about Trump than it is about the general population and their need for validation.”

I find myself arguing with my own reaction here. On one hand, this reads as someone trying to understand a phenomenon rather than simply condemning it—which is refreshing from a Hollywood figure. On the other hand, the “I knew a different guy before politics” framing is the kind of thing that rarely ages well.

But Brolin isn’t offering endorsement. He’s offering observation. The distinction between “mascot” and “leader” is pointed. The focus on marketing genius as exploitation of weakness is hardly flattering. It’s just… more complicated than the usual binary takes we get from celebrity political commentary.

---

December 2026 feels both impossibly far away and startlingly close. By then, we’ll have seen Avengers: Doomsday and whatever the Russo Brothers have planned for Brolin’s Thanos variant. Maybe that iconic Doom-kills-Thanos moment. Maybe something entirely different.

What strikes me about this interview isn’t any single revelation—it’s the portrait of an actor comfortable with complexity. The enthusiasm for motion-capture work that sounds genuine rather than performative. The Villeneuve endorsement that carries real relationship weight. The political observations that resist easy categorization. Brolin has spent a decade playing one of cinema’s most memorable villains, and he emerges from that experience sounding remarkably thoughtful about power, performance, and the strange ways they intersect.

Whether that translates into an equally memorable variant return remains to be seen. But at least we know the guy in the onesie is still having fun.

---

What Josh Brolin’s Interview Reveals

• Thanos return is essentially confirmed. While not officially announced, Brolin’s expected appearance in Doomsday and/or Secret Wars as a variant suggests Marvel has significant plans for the character’s multiverse presence.
• Villeneuve’s Bond has insider enthusiasm. Brolin’s endorsement comes from working relationship, not publicity—making his “hasn’t drunk the Kool-Aid” comment meaningful regarding the director’s approach to franchise filmmaking.
• The Knives Out role isn’t political parody. Monsignor Wicks explores power without accountability as theme rather than specific political commentary, despite surface-level comparisons.
• Brolin offers rare nuance on divisive topics. His political observations focus on marketing psychology and validation needs rather than partisan condemnation—unusual for Hollywood interview territory.
• Motion-capture acting can be genuinely joyful. Against the common narrative of alienating green-screen work, Brolin’s enthusiasm suggests performance capture can enhance rather than diminish creative experience.

---

FAQ