Connect with us

The Business Case Against Smoking in Movies

Movie News

The Business Case Against Smoking in Movies

movies-with-smoking A new research report finds that smoke-free movies make more money at the box office than movies with smoking. Exposure to smoking in movies has been a problem that researchers say can influence up to 200,000 youth to light up for the first time every year. Public health authorities, such as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the World Health Organization, have called on studios to implement policies that would reduce youth exposure to smoking in movies, such as rating movies with smoking R. While studios traditionally rate more movies PG-13 because of their broad reach and higher box office sales, the results suggest that studios could benefit from making a movie smoke-free and would not have any financial justification to delay implementing an R-rating to do so.

Marlene Dietrich Marlene Dietrich

University of California-San Francisco researchers analyzed more than 1,200 films released to U.S. theaters between 2002 and 2010. Their findings show that, on average, movies with smoking only made 87 percent of what comparably rated smoke-free movies made. Among movies with similar smoking status, those that were rated R only made 87 percent of what PG-13 movies made. Cheryl Healton, DrPH, president and CEO of Legacy®, a national public health organization that funded the study says the data make a compelling business case for addressing this major public health issue. “An R rating for future films would be enough incentive for media companies to eliminate smoking from all the films they want to market to kids (G, PG and PG-13 rated). If they did so, movie studios would be better off, and it would result in cutting youth exposure to smoking in movies in half.” An increasing number of prominent U.S. health authorities recommend that the U.S. film industry adopt the R-rating for future movies with smoking. The rating proposal includes exceptions for portrayals of actual historical people who actually used tobacco (such as tobacco-chewing Oakland A’s manager Billy Beane, played by Brad Pitt in Moneyball; PG-13, Sony) or the dire health consequences of tobacco use. Research suggests that implementing an R-rating would mean less youth lighting up for the first time, averting potential disease and death due to tobacco use.
“Faced with evidence that on-screen smoking that harms adolescents is associated with lower box office, why is it taking Hollywood so long to turn the page on tobacco?”
asks Dr. Stanton Glantz, professor of medicine and director of University of California, San Francisco, who coauthored the study. The R-rating policy is predicted to incentivize film producers, who routinely calibrate content to achieve ratings desired for marketing purposes, to eliminate most smoking in youth-rated movies.
“If box office performance is any guide, a typical PG-13 movie without smoking will earn 41 percent more at the box office than a typical R-rated movie that includes smoking,” says Dr. Glantz. “Hollywood has no box office rationale to delay adopting the R-rating for tobacco.”

Jean-Paul Belmondo Jean-Paul Belmondo plays Michel, the amoral hood, in “Breathless” by Jean-Luc Godard. Nobody could model a cigarette like Belmondo.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



To Top