New Trump Biopic Plans $100M Budget

Nothing in modern cinema prepares you for the chaos of casting Donald Trump.
Not the fake baby in American Sniper. Not Jared Leto's Gucci accent. Not even Joaquin Phoenix's Joker laugh. Because dramatizing Trump—full spectrum, from Queens kid to MAGA king—is like adapting a meme into an opera. The highs are too high, the lows too low, and the audience already thinks they know every act.

But that's exactly what producer Andrea Iervolino plans to do, fresh off the back of Ferrari. His proposed $100M Trump biopic (yes, you read that right) is set to be shopped at Cannes, with a production window aimed at late 2025. The ambition? A sweeping, cinematic portrayal of the man who became the 45th—and now 47th—President of the United States.

“Our goal is to deliver a film that is bold, balanced, and artistically ambitious,” Iervolino said in a recent statement.

The problem? Bold and balanced don't often share a screen.

The Real Drama Isn't in the Script—It's in the Pitch

This isn't the first time someone's tried to bottle Trump for the big screen. Ali Abbasi's The Apprentice, a sharply focused drama on Trump's early years, had critics buzzing (and Trump's legal team frothing) thanks to a no-holds-barred tone and performances by Jeremy Strong and Sebastian Stan. That film took aim. Iervolino's version, by contrast, aims for “kinder”—a word that, in 2025, lands like a punchline.

And let's not ignore the elephant in the casting trailer: Who the hell wants to play Trump in a “kinder” light? Because it won't just be a role—it'll be a brand tattoo. Will Mel Gibson put on a blonde wig? Can Zachary Levi withstand the PR inferno? Would James Woods sign on faster than a Truth Social notification? The list of maybes reads like the roster of a politically incorrect Comic-Con.

We've Seen This Movie Before—Sort Of

Big-budget political biopics aren't new. Vice ($60M) turned Dick Cheney into a cinematic villain. JFK rewrote history and still managed to snag eight Oscar nods. But here's the twist: none of those figures were still in power.

Trump isn't a ghost of history. He's a recurring headline. That changes everything. The risk isn't just artistic—it's cultural, commercial, existential. Audiences aren't neutral. They're primed. This movie won't walk into theaters; it'll march into a war zone.

And while Deadline reports this film may take a “more generous” approach than The Apprentice, that alone could tank its credibility with critics—or worse, render it irrelevant with both sides of the aisle.

Hollywood's $100M Question: Can You Humanize a Symbol?

There's a deeper gamble here. Not just financial (though $100M is Avengers-level risky), but philosophical. Because turning Trump into a character—a full character—requires choosing a lens. Villain or visionary? Narcissist or disruptor? Every frame will scream agenda, whether Iervolino wants it to or not.

This project walks a tightrope over lava, and the safety net is on fire.

So—Would You Risk $100M on This Guy's Biopic?

Hollywood loves a comeback. It worships larger-than-life icons. But in this case, the icon is still tweeting (well, Truthing) in real-time. Every casting choice, script draft, and leaked scene will be devoured, weaponized, memed.

Imagine dropping $100 million just to become the main character of the internet for the wrong reason.

Comment below: Would you greenlight it? Or run for the hills?